Provas preferidas na Psicologia :)
	 
    
    
	         
	
      How to Prove It
  
  
- proof by example:
 - The author gives only the case n = 2 and suggests that it   contains most of the ideas of the general proof.
  
 - proof by intimidation:
 - 'Trivial'.
  
 - proof by vigorous handwaving:
 - Works well in a classroom or seminar setting.
  
 - proof by cumbersome notation:
 - Best done with access to at least four alphabets and special  symbols.
  
 - proof by exhaustion:
 - An issue or two of a journal devoted to your proof is useful.
  
 - proof by omission:
 - 'The reader may easily supply the details'
 'The other 253 cases are analogous'
 '...'   
 - proof by obfuscation:
 - A long plotless sequence of true and/or meaningless   syntactically related statements.
  
 - proof by wishful citation:
 - The author cites the negation, converse, or generalization of   a theorem from the literature to support his claims.
  
 - proof by funding:
 - How could three different government agencies be wrong?
  
 - proof by eminent authority:
 - 'I saw Karp in the elevator and he said it was probably NP-  complete.' 
  
 - proof by personal communication:
 - 'Eight-dimensional colored cycle stripping is NP-complete   [Karp, personal communication].' 
  
 - proof by reduction to the wrong problem:
 - 'To see that infinite-dimensional colored cycle stripping is   decidable, we reduce it to the halting problem.' 
  
 - proof by reference to inaccessible literature:
 - The author cites a simple corollary of a theorem to be found   in a privately circulated memoir of the Slovenian   Philological Society, 1883.
  
 - proof by importance:
 - A large body of useful consequences all follow from the   proposition in question.
  
 - proof by accumulated evidence:
 - Long and diligent search has not revealed a counterexample.
  
 - proof by cosmology:
 - The negation of the proposition is unimaginable or   meaningless. Popular for proofs of the existence of God.
  
 - proof by mutual reference:
 - In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from Theorem 3 in   reference B, which is shown to follow from Corollary 6.2 in   reference C, which is an easy consequence of Theorem 5 in   reference A.
  
 - proof by metaproof:
 - A method is given to construct the desired proof. The   correctness of the method is proved by any of these   techniques.
  
 - proof by picture:
 - A more convincing form of proof by example. Combines well   with proof by omission.
  
 - proof by vehement assertion:
 - It is useful to have some kind of authority relation to the   audience.
  
 - proof by ghost reference:
 - Nothing even remotely resembling the cited theorem appears in   the reference given.
  
 - proof by forward reference:
 - Reference is usually to a forthcoming paper of the author,   which is often not as forthcoming as at first.
  
 - proof by semantic shift:
 - Some of the standard but inconvenient definitions are changed   for the statement of the result.
  
 - proof by appeal to intuition:
 - Cloud-shaped drawings frequently help here.
 
- http://www.princeton.edu/~sacm/humor/proof.html
 
     
     
    
    
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
 
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home